Survey
of mental methods for subtraction
The
following section shows some subtractions carried out mentally by
children. They have been loosely classified according to the mathematical
principles involved. The writing in the movies and the adult voice
are only used to help explain the thinking concisely.
Complementary
addition
Students
very often use addition to build up from the subtrahend to the minuend.
For example, to subtract 8 from 11, first see what needs to be added
to 8 to get 11. In this case, counting 8, 9, 10, 11 shows that three
have to be added. Therefore, 11 - 8 must be 3. Alternatively add
2 to get 10 and then another one to get 11.
The
movies below show some examples of mental computation, which
uses the principle of complementary addition. There
will be more than one possible way of 'adding up' to the minuend
(larger number). The idea of mental computation is to select something
easy.
Mark
|
Veena
|
These
movies display the mental computation in a written form, to
help the explanation. Mostly, people would do this without
any writing. There is no correct way to write these methods.
|
Subtraction
in stages
For
subtraction in stages, the subtraction is carried out in two or
more steps. For example, with the question 53 - 34, when taking
away the 34, 30 can be taken away first and then 4. Or it could
be done by taking away 4, then 30, or even 3 then 31. The steps
are selected to make the steps of subtraction as easy as possible.
Vineeth
|
Clare
|
Rounding
Many
students round off either the subtrahend or the minuend or both,
before carrying out subtraction. There are many possible ways of
doing this. In the first movie, the numbers are rounded to 570 and
370, but they could have been rounded to 560 and 360, or anything
else easy. A right choice is an easy choice for the user.
Maggie
|
Hendy
|
Equal
additions principle
The
equal additions principle is often observed in children's mental
computation. According to this principle, adding equal quantities
to the subtrahend and the minuend leaves the answer unaffected.
For
example,
23 - 16 = 7 .......... so that if I add 100 to both numbers, I know
that
123
- 116 = 7 ........ and if I add a thousand to both numbers, I know
that
1023 - 1016 = 7.
This principle is the basis of the equal additions algorithm
for subtraction. (Click here to go
to the Teaching Algorithms for Subtraction page, equal additions.)
Andy
|
Peliwe
|
When
using the equal additions principle for mental computation, a good
choice of the quantity added will make either the subtrahend or
the minuend a round number (e.g. to the nearest ten). As shown in
Andy's movie, the subtrahend (27) is rounded to the nearest ten
(30) by adding 3 to both. The subtraction then becomes much easier
to solve mentally.
Renaming
principle
Students
use the renaming principle when subtracting mentally almost automatically.
The renaming uses place value equivalencies (e.g. ten tens are one
hundred). This principle is the basis of the written subtraction
algorithm called decomposition. (Click
here to go to the Teaching Algorithms for Subtraction page, decomposition.)
Here
are two examples of mental computation using the renaming principle.
Janet
wanted to work out 1400 - 800
Immediately she thought of one thousand four hundred as fourteen
hundred.
Fourteen minus eight is six, so the answer is six hundred.
James
wanted to work out 85 - 73. He thought of 85 as "seventy
and fifteen" (the renaming step) and then only had to subtract
3 from 15. Answer 12.
Other
methods
There
are many other individual innovative methods devised by children
and adults to suit specific questions and many combinations of methods.
Mental computation usually takes advantage of particular properties
of the actual numbers involved. These movies show two other common
methods, which do not fit into the classifications above.
John
John
starts by subtracting 8 ones from 4 ones and records an
answer of negative four ones. He then subtracts 3
tens from 7 tens giving 4 tens (40). The answer of 36 is
found by adding -4 and 40.
|
Cathy
Since
the numbers are close together, Cathy counts back from 103
to 98, recording the difference as she counts.
|
|