In different countries around the world, different symbols are used to mark the decimal part of the number and to separate the thousands. In Australia today we use a decimal point and a space (as a thousands separator), but until the 1970's the accepted notation was a comma as a thousands separator. Not only are different symbols used as decimal markers and thousands separators but they can also be used to convey completely different meanings, i.e. in some cultures a point is used to indicate multiplication. It is important to realise that children from other countries may be accustomed to different notation, making it difficult for them to read and understand numbers in the Australian classroom. Some variation is often also found within a country. The decimal point in Australia (and elsewhere) used to be above the line, but with widespread computer use they are now generally on the line, as in this resource. Below is a table giving an example of notation from several countries.
YOU HAVE HAD A MEAL IN A RESTAURANT IN PORTUGAL. THE BILL IS 17.356,00
HOW MUCH IS THIS?
Difficulties in learning decimals (eg Reverse
thinking) can also stem from differences in children's first
language. For example, Asian language speakers have to make a special
effort to indicate the presence of a 's' at the end of an English
word as it is not their accustomed way of pluralising. Many Europeans
(especially Italian and French) hear 'th' and 'sss' or 'th' and
'd' as too close to distinguish easily. This may cause them to blur
them into one sound unless specifically urged not too. Blends such
as that which occurs at the end of the word 'hundredths' would not
be distinguished easily by most non-English background speakers.
Remember that English speakers cannot hear all the sounds in
other languages either.
For information about this page, contact: Vicki Steinle
Contact Email Address: email@example.com
Department Homepage: www.edfac.unimelb.edu.au/DSME
Faculty Homepage: www.edfac.unimelb.edu.au/
Last modified: Fri 21 September 2012
This page, its contents and style, are the responsibility of the author and
do not represent the views, policies or opinions of The University of Melbourne.